Get the verdict
Versus · October 2026

Nano Banana

Nano Banana 2.1
VS

Ideogram

Ideogram 4.0
API price4 credits per 1K image4 / 7 / 11 credits (low/med/high)
Cost (8 images)Nano Banana $0.32Ideogram $0.56
October scoreNano Banana 8.9Ideogram 8.7
The verdict

Nano Banana wins, 5–2 (1 tied)

Head-to-head on 8 identical prompts: Nano Banana won 5, Ideogram won 2, 1 tied. Average score: 8.9 vs 8.7. The gap is small, so treat it as close and pick based on the shots you make.

Try Gemini (Nano Banana) ↗Try Ideogram ↗

adherence
9.0
8.9
quality
9.0
8.5
artifacts
8.6
8.6
01

Fisherman portrait

Prompt 13: “Photoreal headshot of a 60-year-old fisherman, weathered skin, overcast light.”

Nano Banana 2.1 output Nano Banana 2.1 9.0
~4 cr ($0.04) · 21s render

adherence 9quality 9artifacts 9
Weathered fisherman, overcast light, boat context.

Ideogram 4.0 output Ideogram 4.0 8.7
~7 cr ($0.07) · 22s render

adherence 8quality 9artifacts 9
Weathered face, overcast harbour; less fisherman styling.

02

Text: GRAND OPENING

Prompt 14: “A poster with the exact text "GRAND OPENING SATURDAY" in bold retro type.”

Nano Banana 2.1 output Nano Banana 2.1 9.7
~4 cr ($0.04) · 21s render

adherence 10quality 9artifacts 10
Exact text, richer retro poster design.

Ideogram 4.0 output Ideogram 4.0 9.3
~7 cr ($0.07) · 21s render

adherence 10quality 8artifacts 10
Exact text, clean retro type; plain composition.

03

Isometric bedroom

Prompt 15: “Isometric cozy bedroom, Pixar-style 3D render.”

Nano Banana 2.1 output Nano Banana 2.1 9.0
~4 cr ($0.04) · 21s render

adherence 9quality 9artifacts 9
Highly detailed cozy isometric room.

Ideogram 4.0 output Ideogram 4.0 8.7
~7 cr ($0.07) · 26s render

adherence 9quality 8artifacts 9
Cute Pixar-like isometric room, simpler detail.

04

Skincare flat-lay

Prompt 16: “Flat-lay of a skincare product line on marble, ad-ready.”

Nano Banana 2.1 output Nano Banana 2.1 8.7
~4 cr ($0.04) · 22s render

adherence 9quality 9artifacts 8
Ad-ready flat-lay, mostly legible labels; one smudged label.

Ideogram 4.0 output Ideogram 4.0 8.0
~7 cr ($0.07) · 26s render

adherence 8quality 8artifacts 8
Minimal and sparse; labels mostly unreadable.

05

Fantasy island map

Prompt 17: “Fantasy map of an island kingdom, hand-drawn ink and watercolor.”

Nano Banana 2.1 output Nano Banana 2.1 8.7
~4 cr ($0.04) · 26s render

adherence 9quality 9artifacts 8
Rich detailed map; duplicated place name and one garbled label.

Ideogram 4.0 output Ideogram 4.0 8.7
~7 cr ($0.07) · 32s render

adherence 9quality 9artifacts 8
Ink and watercolour map; 'SEAA' spelling error.

06

Rooftop selfie (hands)

Prompt 18: “Five friends taking a selfie at a rooftop party, everyone's hands visible.”

Nano Banana 2.1 output Nano Banana 2.1 8.3
~4 cr ($0.04) · 32s render

adherence 8quality 9artifacts 8
Five friends plus background crowd; hands well formed.

Ideogram 4.0 output Ideogram 4.0 8.7
~7 cr ($0.07) · 21s render

adherence 9quality 9artifacts 8
Five friends taking a selfie, hands mostly correct; a few hidden.

07

Character sheet

Prompt 19: “A consistent character: a red-haired girl in a yellow raincoat, 3 poses on one sheet.”

Nano Banana 2.1 output Nano Banana 2.1 9.0
~4 cr ($0.04) · 32s render

adherence 9quality 9artifacts 9
Consistent character in 3 expressive poses.

Ideogram 4.0 output Ideogram 4.0 9.3
~7 cr ($0.07) · 21s render

adherence 10quality 9artifacts 9
Proper turnaround sheet, consistent character.

08

YouTube thumbnail

Prompt 20: “YouTube thumbnail: a shocked man pointing at a giant glowing graph, high contrast.”

Nano Banana 2.1 output Nano Banana 2.1 8.7
~4 cr ($0.04) · 37s render

adherence 9quality 9artifacts 8
Strong shocked face, high contrast, glowing graph; busy numbers.

Ideogram 4.0 output Ideogram 4.0 8.0
~7 cr ($0.07) · 26s render

adherence 8quality 8artifacts 8
Pointing at glowing graph, added 'INSANE!' text; shock is mild.

⚖️
Outputs are unedited and shown as the API returned them (images resized for speed; click for originals). Scores are editorial judgments made with a fixed rubric, scoring each output without knowing which model made it. Methodology